![](\"https:\/\/www.phillipnova.com.sg\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Crude-Oil-1-Apr-2026.png\")
<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n
<\/p>\r\n
<\/p>\r\n
Oil markets are no longer trading barrels; it’s the headlines that are being priced. Oil\u2019s historic surge, up roughly 50% through March, marks the steepest monthly gain in decades as war-driven supply shocks collide with the paralysis of key transit routes. Nearly a fifth of global crude flows are exposed to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and further concerns in the Red Sea have pushed prices into a structurally tight regime.<\/p>\r\n
<\/p>\r\n
A disruption or blockage of the Red Sea<\/span><\/span> would significantly impact global oil markets by slowing the flow of crude between the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. Tankers would be forced to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope<\/span><\/span>, adding roughly 10\u201320 days to transit times depending on the route.<\/strong> This effectively tightens supply even without a drop in production, likely pushing oil prices higher as traders price in delays and rising geopolitical risk.<\/p>\r\n \u00a0<\/p>\r\n At the same time, longer voyages reduce vessel availability and drive freight rates higher, benefiting tanker companies but increasing overall transportation costs. These rising energy and logistics costs can feed into inflation, putting pressure on fuel-dependent sectors like airlines, manufacturing, and logistics, while also complicating central bank policy decisions.<\/p>\r\n \u00a0<\/p>\r\n Overall, the impact extends beyond physical supply disruptions – markets would likely price in a geopolitical risk premium, leading to higher volatility and sustained upward pressure on oil prices, especially if disruptions persist.<\/p>\r\n \u00a0<\/p>\r\n Yet the latest 3% pullback in Brent underscores how fragile this rally is. Sidelining fundamentals, Oil triggered a pullback by rhetoric after Donald Trump signalled the war could end within 2-3 weeks and deprioritised reopening Hormuz. Despite his shrugging, markets read that statement for what it is: the only option left when allies refuse to underwrite tanker security in the world\u2019s most critical chokepoint. Meanwhile, beyond shipping disruptions, the physical supply shock is now measurable, with OPEC output falling by roughly 7.3 million barrels per day in March, marking the sharpest contraction since the pandemic-era collapse.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n Traders and investors should note that even in de-escalation scenarios, oil prices are likely to remain supported, with forecasts pointing toward $100 per barrel depending on how quickly supply chains normalise. Even if it starts to descalate, the flow of tankers won’t resume right away. Even after the ceasefire, shipping costs and insurance tanker movement will take time to return to normal. The actual damage to oil infrastructure will also be assessed only afterwards. We never get a true picture of the damage\/repairs required during the confrontation. As of 10:00 am Singapore Standard time, WTI trades at $102.92 per barrel up by 1.52%, while Brent inched up by 2.40% to $105.77 per barrel.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n The demand side is beginning to crack under the weight of that shock. A Reuters\/Ipsos poll shows 60% of Americans disapprove of US strikes on Iran versus just 35% approval, highlighting rising political resistance as fuel costs surge. At the pump, prices in the U.S. and globally are climbing sharply, feeding inflation fears and reinforcing stagflation risks flagged by energy executives.<\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n A new escalation risk is emerging as the United Arab Emirates signals readiness to join a multinational force to forcibly reopen the Strait of Hormuz, potentially becoming the first Persian Gulf nation to enter the conflict directly.<\/strong> This follows repeated Iranian drone and missile attacks on Emirati infrastructure and raises the risk of the conflict regionalising across Gulf exporters. If the UAE enters the conflict, the war shifts from a bilateral confrontation into a regional security crisis, increasing the probability of prolonged disruption to Gulf energy flows.<\/p>\r\n <\/p>\r\n The market is caught in a classic late-cycle squeeze, with geopolitics constraining supply faster than demand can adjust, and every incremental price spike accelerates economic drag.<\/strong> As a result, oil hovers in a volatile territory, trading in wide intraday bands, dictated more by diplomatic signals than by physical flows. In the near term, expect elevated prices with sharp downside air pockets. However, unless Hormuz fully reopens and smooth barrel flow resumes, dips are likely to be bought, not sold.<\/p>\r\n \u00a0<\/p>\r\n